Best Reviewer may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page.
Seeing is believing is more than just a phrase; people tend to judge the world around them by sight more than any other sense and take considerable pains to make sure they are seeing the world as clearly as possible. Since the early 1800s, people have wanted to be able to see the world in as clear and precise detail as possible. This has led to a never-ending quest for the best video camera and highest quality screen that the world can provide.
Photography, though an important development in the field of optical technology, is far from the only technology that has been developed to improve our view of what goes on around us. Since the days of the legendary Galileo Galilei, the same refractive principles that go into making a telephoto lens in a camera have been used to magnify the smallest of objects into readily viewable images. This device used small, precisely ground lenses to allow scientists to see otherwise invisible organisms in pond water, and so became the forerunner of the modern microscope.
A short while before Galileo’s device, a Dutch pageant was filed for a device used to improve the user’s view of an object. Although this was to be used on more everyday objects than microbes in pond water, the principle was the same. The objective observations were quite small to the naked eye and needed to be seen larger and in more detail. Unlike Galileo, this device was to be used to overcome perspective, rather than absolute size. The inventor intended to aim his device at such things as men, horses, and ships, all of which would appear tiny due to distance, and use it to see them as if he stood right in front of them.
The telescope (or spyglass as it became called) rapidly became a fixture of maritime and military society, to the point where it has become a cliche of the popular perception of ancient mariners. Its use was to continue well past the United States Civil War, and it was rapidly adapted to many other pursuits. Even today, astronomers rely on telescopes to keep them apprised of the movements of the heavens around us.
Before even that, another famous scientist – one Isaac Newton – discovered the possibility of ‘bending light’ by reflecting it through something other than air. This discovery became known as the prison and served as the foundation for the science of collecting, redirecting, and refracting light that is at the heart of optical devices of any kind throughout the ages.
In all fairness, the use of eyeglasses predates both prism and telescope by several centuries. There are reliable records of glass lenses being used to improve eyesight as early as the 1300s. It was not until the 1800s, though, that an invention would appear to combine all of these technologies at once.
The binocular telescope appeared in the mid-1800s and was rapidly accepted for its significant advantages over the single lens models that had preceded it. Among these advantages were increased peripheral vision for the user, the ability to adjust the lenses for two separate focuses when the user had two different eye strengths and added depth perception t1hat comes from using both eyes.
Binoculars were soon to be seen in a wide variety of fields. One could find them in an endless array of military or emergency response roles, in nature studies and tourist attractions, and even at sporting events or theaters where the performers or athletes were too far away to truly appreciate with the naked eye.
Although binoculars were to become so popular that there would soon be a specific model for any field where they saw use, they still shared certain features with the optical aids that they had replaced. Namely, the work of calibrating and grinding the lenses, as well as properly mounting them to create a functional pair of optics, was and remains a demanding and time-consuming task. depending on the field for which they were intended, could easily cost enough to make users reconsider how badly they wanted to see the subject in question.
In time, the market would resolve this problem as well, and a new breed of binoculars would become available. Well, these are neither as specialized nor as resilient as the field or offer of glasses that they replaced, they would make long-range viewing a realistic pastime for a much broader populace than before. While there are some professions and individuals that will always demand a higher grade of optics, others can now rest assured that they can find suitable binoculars for a reasonable price.
The advent of mass production has helped to resolve this issue in no small way. Binoculars of all descriptions are now readily available and can be had without specially commissioned sets of lenses designed for only one pair of eyes. Still, binoculars remain a more costly purchase than most people can afford, particularly if the user maintains a certain standard of quality or performance that they require before buying.
With cheap binoculars in production and becoming steadily more available through such things as online shopping, the question becomes one of customer protection. How can you, as the user, be sure that the binoculars you are getting will be worth what you paid for them – however little that may have been? It is no secret that many users have been lured into buying unusably substandard goods by a price that it was indeed too good to be true.
The threat of being scammed into buying poor quality binoculars may seem a daunting specter to overcome, but never fear; we’ve assembled the best binoculars that you can get for the low 200 quid, Assuring you of a good pair of field glasses without needing to break the bank. Choose one that lives up to your particular needs and expectations and get ready to see the great big world out there get a lot closer than it has ever been.
Best Binoculars under £200 UK Comparison Table
PRODUCT | FEATURES | LATEST PRICE |
---|---|---|
1. Kylietech |
| Check Price |
2. Eono by Amazon |
| Check Price |
3. Apeman |
| Check Price |
4. VCOSTORE Compact |
| Check Price |
5. Eyeskey Classic HD |
| Check Price |
6. Gianni |
| Check Price |
7. QNIGLO |
| Check Price |
8. Slokey |
| Check Price |
9. Outerman |
| Check Price |
10. Zaeel Zoom |
| Check Price |
11. PAIPU |
| Check Price |
12. Lachesis Benkoo |
| Check Price |
13. ESSLNB |
| Check Price |
14. CMY |
| Check Price |
15. Teaisiy FMK |
| Check Price |
Our Best Best Binoculars Under £200 UK Reviews and Comparisons
1. Kylietech
Product Highlights
This is a simple but powerful model that comes with a number of helpful accessories in addition to the glasses themselves.
Features
- 42mm coated lenses
- 12×42 viewing
- Effective range up to 1000 yards
- Unit weight .84 kilograms
What We Like About Kylietech
With the help of the included accessory pack, these glasses turn my smartphone into a telephoto camera. They also weigh less than a kilogram and have a compact profile to allow them to be taken anywhere with ease.
What We Don’t Like About Kylietech
These glasses are on occasion improperly calibrated and will give a larger or smaller image than desired. The accessories are built with brittle plastic that cannot handle much jostling around.
PROS
- Easy to carry
- Travel case
- Included shoulder or neck strap
- Protective coating on lenses
- Smartphone camera adapter
CONS
- Poor quality accessories
- Not the most powerful on the market
2. Eono by Amazon
Product Highlights
This manufacturer includes a heavily customizable set of lens caps to let you decide exactly which optics you want to use and when.
Features
- 0x42 viewing
- Unit weight .63 kilograms
- Rubber coated chassis
- BAK4 prism
What We Like About Eono by Amazon
These binoculars are backed by all of Amazon’s considerable expertise in meeting consumer needs. They integrate small but vital features, like a rubber coating to make them easier to hold when wet or an integrated tripod interface so that they never need to be held at all.
What We Don’t Like About Eono by Amazon
The waterproofing on this model may be substandard and should certainly not be trusted to withstand full immersion. The lens caps are exceptionally troublesome, to the point where some users advise discarding them entirely.
PROS
- Trusted manufacturer
- Quick and safe supply worldwide
- Easy to carry
- Extra grip on lens barrels
- Integrated tripod interface for effortless extended viewing
CONS
- Unreliable waterproofing
- Irritatingly low-quality lens caps
3. Apeman
Product Highlights
This manufacturer includes a heavily customizable set of lens caps to let you decide exactly which optics you want to use and when.
Features
- 1000m effective field of view
- 10×42 viewing
- Unit weighs 439 grams
- Eye relief 15.5mm
What We Like About Apeman
One of the keys to understanding modern binoculars is that the two eyes frequently focus independently of one another, making for two calibrations in the same tool. The focus wheels on this model allow you to do that with ease, and the specialized lens covers let you shut out the other optic until you’re ready to use it again.
What We Don’t Like About Apeman
All the extra lens covers mean more gear and more parts and pieces that can go wrong. The supposedly universal smartphone adapter is anything but – and slides right off of narrower phones.
PROS
- Specialized lens covers
- 24/7 live customer service
- 12-month warranty
- Smartphone adapter included
- Angular anti-slip design
CONS
- Most of the accessories aren’t strictly necessary
- The Smartphone adapter does not fit all phones by default and is hard to adjust
4. VCOSTORE Compact
Product Highlights
Where most models of field classes are concerned only with making a more powerful model, this pair is made with a new market sector in mind – the child or young adult age bracket.
Features
- Unit weight .22 kilograms
- 8×21 viewing
- Fixed chassis
- Rigid plastic grips
What We Like About VCOSTORE Compact
With this pair of field glasses, exceptional optics and range are so small and accessible that they can literally fit in the palm of the hand. This model is exceptionally resilient as well and can handle both immersion and shock with ease.
What We Don’t Like About VCOSTORE Compact
These glasses are so small that larger users may find them difficult or uncomfortable to work with. The chassis is a single piece and is impossible to adjust for different shapes and sizes of the face
PROS
- Shockproof
- Accessory pack included
- One of the most compact models on the market
- Sized for children
- Comfortable viewing ports
CONS
- Too small for most adult users
- The frame has no central joint
5. Eyeskey Classic HD
Product Highlights
These glasses take binoculars back to the basics with a simple but successful chassis construction.
Features
- 10×42 viewing
- Unit weight .98 kilograms
- 293-foot field of view at 1000 yards
- 14mm eye relief
What We Like About Eyeskey Classic HD
This pair of glasses replace innovative features with improving the existing ones, using high-quality engineering to make an exceptional experience out of an otherwise ordinary product. The lens caps are connected to the body with thick rubber pieces resistant to tearing off or getting lost.
What We Don’t Like About Eyeskey Classic HD
These glasses are near twice the weight of most other models, an inconvenience if being packed for a trek or air travel. The included neck strap has been reported as unreliable and may unravel around the connectors.
PROS
- Intuitive design
- Waterproof even under full submersion
- Anti-fog coating
- Control knob is large and easy to use
- Comes with a variety of accessories
CONS
- Heavier than most other models
- Unreliable accessories
6. Gianni
Product Highlights
This is a hefty pair of glasses with an offset lens that gives it a wider field of view and a greater independent focus on each lens.
Features
- 20×50 viewing
- Unit weight .73 kilograms
- Offset lenses
- Multi-coated lenses
What We Like About Gianni
These glasses are built along with military guidelines, with an extra prism in the chassis that allows for the inclusion of much larger lenses than usual by spacing them farther apart. The lens coatings have been evenly applied across the entire surface of the lens to ensure total broadband viewing with no loss of quality at the edges.
What We Don’t Like About Gianni
The chassis on these glasses is stiff and hard to properly adjust to taste, especially if one might need to readjust quickly to track a subject. The rubber coating is thicker than it really needs to be, and the offset design ruins the binocular’s chances of a small and impact silhouette that would be easy to pack in a bag or strap to a backpack.
PROS
- High-quality image
- Immersion resistant
- Multiple lens coatings against fog and glare
- Full broadband viewing
- Military-style construction and materials
CONS
- Offset lens design is far more awkward than inline
- Chassis and controls are stiff and hard to manipulate
7. QNIGLO
Product Highlights
These simple and sturdy field glasses are a great choice for someone who wants magnification instead of frills.
Features
- 10×42 viewing
- Unit weight .71 kilograms
- IP55 waterproofing
- Field of view 294 feet at 1000 yards
What We Like About QNIGLO
These binoculars are a simple telescope design to reduce distortion to the maximum possible extent. They are also rated IP55, the international standard for waterproofing in stormy conditions.
What We Don’t Like About QNIGLO
The housing in these binoculars is low-quality plastic and is not resistant to shock or crushing. Although IP55 is a good rating against inclement weather, it does not cover even brief submersion.
PROS
- Minimal distortion
- Compact design
- Smartphone adapter included
- IP55 waterproofing
- Multiple layers of lens coating enhance image color
CONS
- Not rated for full submersion
- Weak construction
8. Slokey
Product Highlights
This set of binoculars brings you the quality of the field’s upper crust with the price of the bargain basement.
Features
- 8×32 viewing
- Unit weight .43 kilograms
- IP67 waterproofing
- Field of view 125 feet at 1000 yards
What We Like About Slokey
Although smaller and with less field of view than most models in this price bracket, these glasses represent an impressive improvement in the quality of manufacture and customer support. They are available in sizes and weights optimized for a wide range of pursuits, allowing you to choose the set best suited to your pastime.
What We Don’t Like About Slokey
Added quality naturally comes at a higher cost – these binoculars are more than four times the average price of a similar pair. They sacrifice a certain amount of functionality as well, with a smaller field of view and lower magnification than cheaper models.
PROS
- Exceptional customer service
- Multiple customized models
- IP67 waterproofing
- High quality materials
- Integrated tripod adapter
CONS
- Smaller than most binoculars of the same size
- Unusual costly
9. Outerman
Product Highlights
This pair of binoculars are ready for the outdoors with a superb waterproof rating and a military-style offset lens design.
Features
- 20×50 viewing
- Unit weight .90 kilograms
- IPX7 waterproofing
- Compatible with most standard tripods
What We Like About Outerman
This unit’s IPX7 waterproofing is effective against full submersion, as well as fog, grit, and dirt, making it one of the best waterproofing systems on the market. These field glasses are also compatible with tripods, which helps you keep watching longer than supporting them by hand.
What We Don’t Like About Outerman
This unit is both heavier and larger than most others, and so will be more difficult to load into a backpack or handbag; this is especially true given its offset lens design, which makes for a much less regular silhouette than an ordinary telescope shape. Despite this heavier weight and having a bracket for one, there is no shoulder or neck strap included.
PROS
- Exceptionally high waterproofing rating
- Fog proof and glare-resistant lens coating
- Hardened rubber shell for added resilience
- Textured grip
- Independent focus for each eye
CONS
- Heavier than most models
- Does not include common accessories
10. Zaeel Zoom
Product Highlights
This set of binoculars uses a unique lens shape to minimize distortion and achieve higher magnification than standard field glasses.
Features
- 12×50 viewing
- Unit weight .72 kilograms
- 87 meters field of view at 1000 meters
- Eye distance 16.5 millimeters
What We Like About Zaeel Zoom
The lenses in these glasses are shaped for more accurate refraction and magnification than other binoculars, making them able to achieve greater effective range while staying the same size. A full accessory kit and maintenance instructions are included, making them easier to use and care for.
What We Don’t Like About Zaeel Zoom
This set is far heavier than most everyday binoculars and can be inconvenient to carry for extended periods of time. The lenses can be troublesome to those used to more traditional shapes, and it can take some time to fully understand how to properly focus them.
PROS
- Resilient outset shell
- Non-Slip textured grips
- Advanced magnification technology
- Center knob is highly responsive
- Minimal distortion
CONS
- Can take some time to get used to
- Twice as heavy as competing models
11. PAIPU
Product Highlights
These binoculars take the features usually found in much larger models and put them into a small, convenient size that anyone can pack for a day.
Features
- 10×40 viewing
- Unit weight .58 kilograms
- 211-foot field of view at 1000 yards
- IP40 waterproofing
What We Like About PAIPU
These field glasses are coated for use in fog, haze, and glare, making them the visual equivalent of a much larger set. The casing is shockproof and is rated with IP40 waterproofing, allowing them to be used in inclement weather with no fear of water damage.
What We Don’t Like About PAIPU
As waterproofing goes, IP40 is hardly much to write home about, as it doesn’t even cover all levels of precipitation. There is noticeable distortion around the edges of the image, although the center remains quite clear under most circumstances.
PROS
- Extremely convenient size
- Durable casing
- Quick to focus
- Accessory kit included
- Good light transmission or brighter images
CONS
- Lackluster penetration resistance
- Distorted image
12. Lachesis Benkoo
Product Highlights
This set features a sustainable rubber coating and a deep grip pattern for superior hold no matter what gets on the glasses.
Features
- 20×50 viewing
- Unit weight .92 kilograms
- BAK7 prism
- 50mm objective lens
What We Like About Lachesis Benkoo
Like many higher-end models of binocular, these field glasses are covered in rubber to make them easier to grip and clean. The difference here is that the rubber coating and some other components are made with recycled or sustainable ingredients – perfect for someone who wants to take these glasses for nature watching.
What We Don’t Like About Lachesis Benkoo
Multiple users report receiving this model missing either the tripod adapter or lenses of the correct magnification, making it a chancy buy at best. The lenses are poorly seated and cannot be easily replaced should they come loose or need to be removed for servicing.
PROS
- Environmentally friendly rubber shell
- Deeper grips than usual
- Full Accessory kit included
- Independent focus for each eye
- BAK7 prisms have reduced distortion and transmit light better than previous versions
CONS
- Poor construction and reliability
- Multiple errors in manufacturing
13. ESSLNB
Product Highlights
These field glasses offer a new level of comfort to the viewer with adjustable eye cups and multilayer light filter for more natural viewing
Features
- 8×42 viewing
- Unit weight .94 kilograms
- IPX7 waterproofing
- 331-foot field of view at 1000 yards
What We Like About ESSLNB
This set includes soft rubber cups that conform easily to ordinary glasses, making it more comfortable for users who wear glasses every day. The lenses include a five-layer filter coating that softens glare and enriches colors for a more detailed viewing experience.
What We Don’t Like About ESSLNB
These binoculars are somewhat heavier than most models and can be hard to hold up for longer periods of time. They are also close to 3X the cost of most competing binoculars, lessening the value for your money.
PROS
- High waterproofing rating
- Multilayer lens filter coating
- Exceptionally wide field of view
- Shockproof rubber housing
- Lead free glass has fewer distortions
CONS
- Older BAK4 prisms have less light transmission and more distortion
- Filter layers can make these glasses hard to use in low light
14. CMY
Product Highlights
This set takes advantage of a particularly wide objective lens to offer the user an extended field of view and better magnification than other models.
Features
- Single shelf design
- Wooden work surface
- Angled rubber leg stoppers
- Solid metal frame<
What We Like About CMY
These field glasses rectify a common mistake found in many other models. Instead of having a fixed-width smartphone clip that can only hold certain phone models, these have an adjustable smartphone clip to hold nearly every model of phone. They are also IPX4 rated, making them safe to use in full submersion or serious precipitation
What We Don’t Like About CMY
The mobile phone clip’s adjustable components make it far less stable than the clamps included in other binoculars. Some users report instructions or pieces of the accessory pack missing, which can be hard to replace for any one particular model of binoculars.
PROS
- Wide objective lens
- Molded grips
- Independent focus
- Highly adaptable phone holder
- Thick, sturdy casing
CONS
- Incomplete accessory pack
- Phone clamp is unstable when in use
15. Teaisiy FMK
Product Highlights
These binoculars come with a more compatible frame than most, allowing you to unfold them for a wider field of view and collapse them into a small case for easy transport or storage.
Features
- 10×50 viewing
- Unit weight 1.1 kilograms
- BAK4 prisms
- 138m field of view from 1000m away
What We Like About Teaisiy FMK
These binoculars have a solid metal skeleton that makes them exceptionally durable under harsh conditions and transport and an ABS anti-skid exterior that keeps them firmly in the user’s hand no matter what. Extra-wide objective lenses give a broad field of view, and a series of lens coatings keep it clear of defects or optical distortions.
What We Don’t Like About Teaisiy FMK
This is one of the heaviest sets of budget binoculars around, weighing in at over a kilogram. It is also hard to keep focused while in transit, as it needs to be folded to fit into the carrying case. Folding the binoculars resets the alignment between eyes and necessitates refocusing anew each time.
PROS
- Exceptionally durable
- Largest objective lenses in class
- Waterproof
- Three-month satisfaction or replacement guarantee
- Filter coating eliminate glare, fog, or color distortion
CONS
- Exceptionally heavy
- Cannot be permanently set to one focus
Final Verdict
Apeman
Not for nothing did these binoculars win the prestigious Amazon’s Choice award. They combine good performance in all fields with a price and durability that makes them an easy first pick for anyone searching for a pair of field glasses on a budget. The year-long guarantee means that even if they do foul up, you’ll be able to get them replaced at no charge for a whole year after buying.
There are a number of different uses suggested for all of these models. Does it matter which binoculars I bring to which event?
From the optical standpoint alone, it doesn’t matter which field glasses you employ to see what; the principles of optics remain the same whether or not your binoculars were specifically constructed for the particular pursuit in question. That said, it is worth noting that all other principles of physics remain the same as well and that there are many other considerations besides the magnification and focus to be accounted for.
First among these is the weight of the glasses and their exterior dimensions. You’ll need to be able to take your binoculars with you when pursuing your chosen subject of observation, so keep in mind how far away that might be and how much else you might need to carry there. Binoculars can be quite heavy and tiring to lug around.
Besides the weight, of course, one must consider how one intends to pack them. If you are simply going birdwatching, they may well be your largest piece of equipment, and so their awkward shape will be less of a hindrance. For those trekking or in a military or law enforcement position, there may be a need for more compact binoculars that will allow for plenty of other equipment as well.
Conversely, more urban pursuits like a concert or sports viewing will usually require relatively little magnification, and so the field glasses used to view them should be able to be transported in a purse or pocket. Many models come with a strap or case, which should also be taken into account while packing.
Lastly, there is the matter of durability – some binoculars use hardened lenses or steel hulls to prevent damage; others use plastic to keep things small and light. Picking which of these you really need is an important part of selecting the appropriate binoculars for any pursuit.
Many of the binoculars mention something called a prism. What is it, and how important is it to have?
A prism is a transparent piece of material that refracts, or bends, the light that passes through it. This can make the reflected light of which an image is composed effectively turn a corner where it would otherwise go straight.
In many binoculars, the lenses that gather that light are too big to sit side by side, and so must be set well apart from each other for the device to work. This distance between lenses is corrected by a prism, which makes the light collected turn the ninety-degree corner within the binoculars to arrive at the viewing lenses as if they were seeing the same thing from much closer together, making an image the brain’s optical nerves can process.
For this reason, having a prism is vital to any offset pair of binoculars. Some models space the lenses closer together, making them effectively two telescopes that sit side by side. This model is usually smaller and easier to stow and is preferred for sporting events or concerts for its more convenient size and shape.
Read Next: